AI comparison report

ASICS GT 2000 13 vs Nimbus 27

By CompareAI Editorial Team · Published 2026-10-04 · How we compare

Choose the ASICS GT-2000 13 for lightweight, structured stability across daily training, or opt for the ASICS Nimbus 27 for maximalist, ultra-plush comfort on…

Who wins: ASICS GT 2000 13 or Nimbus 27?

Choose the ASICS GT-2000 13 first if you need active pronation control or a lighter, versatile daily workhorse; choose the ASICS Nimbus 27 first if you are a neutral runner prioritizing maximalist underfoot plushness and recovery comfort.

Based on our analysis across 5 dimensions with 20 sources, ASICS GT 2000 13 scores 8.4/10 overall while Nimbus 27 scores 7.9/10 overall.

DimensionASICS GT 2000 13Nimbus 27
Cushioning & Stack Height7.8/109.2/10
Stability & Pronation Support9.2/105.8/10
Weight & Running Dynamics8.5/107.5/10
Intended Use & Training Role8.5/108/10
Upper Fit & Step-In Comfort8.1/109.2/10
Overall8.4/107.9/10

Should I choose ASICS GT 2000 13 or Nimbus 27?

Verdict: Choose the ASICS GT-2000 13 first if you need active pronation control or a lighter, versatile daily workhorse; choose the ASICS Nimbus 27 first if you are a neutral runner prioritizing maximalist underfoot plushness and recovery comfort.

Choose the ASICS GT-2000 13 for lightweight, structured stability across daily training, or opt for the ASICS Nimbus 27 for maximalist, ultra-plush comfort on neutral recovery and long runs.

Select the ASICS GT-2000 13 if your priority is stability and versatile daily running dynamics. Weighing approximately 9.5 oz (269 g) with an 8.0 mm drop, it features a moderate 36.5 mm heel stack, a structured 3D Guidance System with a 4 out of 5 torsional rigidity score, and an exceptional 5 out of 5 heel padding durability rating. In contrast, choose the ASICS Nimbus 27 if you are a neutral runner wanting peak shock absorption for easy and recovery days; it utilizes a massive 43.5 mm heel stack, a 10.0 mm drop, and an expansive 123.6 mm forefoot base, trading a heavier 10.7 oz (303 g) profile for premium plushness and vibration dampening.

Best for ASICS GT 2000 13

  • Runners with mild to moderate overpronation needing the 3D Guidance System and a 4 out of 5 torsional rigidity score
  • Athletes seeking a lighter daily trainer at approximately 9.5 oz (269 g) for versatile training paces
  • Runners preferring a moderate 36.5 mm heel stack with balanced cushioning and clear ground feel
  • Those who require versatile width availability ranging from Narrow to Extra Wide
  • Runners prioritizing heel collar longevity with a 5 out of 5 heel padding durability score
  • Athletes who favor a moderate 8.0 mm heel-to-toe drop for varied daily mileage

Best for Nimbus 27

  • Neutral runners desiring maximalist impact protection with a 43.5 mm heel stack height
  • Athletes focused on slow recovery miles and long slow distance runs
  • Runners seeking maximum step-in comfort from a premium jacquard mesh upper and stretchy knit tongue
  • Neutral runners who prefer inherent wide-base geometry via a 123.6 mm forefoot platform
  • Runners looking for heavy vibration dampening despite a heavier 10.7 oz (303 g) build
  • Athletes who prefer a 10.0 mm heel-to-toe drop for plush rearfoot shock absorption

When not to compare directly

Do not compare the ASICS GT-2000 13 and ASICS Nimbus 27 directly if your primary criterion is dedicated pronation correction, as the GT-2000 13 is a structured stability trainer with medial guidance mechanisms, whereas the Nimbus 27 is an ultra-cushioned neutral trainer with no medial posting.

What are the key differences between ASICS GT 2000 13 and Nimbus 27?

  • Cushioning & Stack Height

    The ASICS Nimbus 27 delivers a maximalist 43.5mm heel stack for maximum plushness, whereas the ASICS GT-2000 13 offers a moderate 36.5mm heel stack for balanced cushioning and greater ground feel.

    ASICS GT 2000 13: The ASICS GT-2000 13 utilizes a moderate 36.5mm heel stack with FF Blast Plus foam and rearfoot PureGEL, providing balanced cushioning with responsive ground feel and stable impact absorption.

    Nimbus 27: The ASICS Nimbus 27 features a maximalist 43.5mm heel stack engineered for ultra-plush underfoot comfort, maximizing impact protection over long and recovery miles at the expense of ground feel.

    Scores — ASICS GT 2000 13: 7.8/10, Nimbus 27: 9.2/10

    Determines the level of impact protection, plushness underfoot, and ground feel over varied distances.

    Sources: Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 13 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)

  • Stability & Pronation Support

    While the ASICS GT-2000 13 actively corrects overpronation via its specialized 3D Guidance System with a 4 out of 5 torsional rigidity score, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 relies solely on a neutral 123.6 mm wide-base geometry for baseline support.

    ASICS GT 2000 13: The ASICS GT-2000 13 is a dedicated moderate stability trainer engineered specifically for overpronators, utilizing the 3D Guidance System with an 8.0 mm heel drop, structured medial platform geometry, and torsional stiffness rated 4 out of 5 to actively control pronation [1].

    Nimbus 27: The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is a neutral, max-cushion trainer with a 10.0 mm heel drop and an expansive 123.6 mm forefoot base that provides inherent platform stability without dedicated medial posting or targeted pronation-control mechanisms [2].

    Scores — ASICS GT 2000 13: 9.2/10, Nimbus 27: 5.8/10

    Runners with overpronation require specific guidance features to prevent joint strain, whereas neutral runners may prefer less structured guidance.

    Sources: Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 13 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)

  • Weight & Running Dynamics

    The ASICS GT-2000 13 is notably lighter at approximately 9.5 oz for snappier transitions, whereas the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 weighs around 10.7 oz to provide a plush, vibration-dampened maximalist platform.

    ASICS GT 2000 13: The ASICS GT-2000 13 weighs approximately 9.5 oz (269 g) for a men's size 9, utilizing a responsive FF Blast Plus midsole with a 36.5 mm heel stack to deliver nimble, stable transitions and a snappier ride during uptempo and daily training.

    Nimbus 27: The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 weighs approximately 10.7 oz (303 g) with a maximalist 40.5 mm heel stack, prioritizing heavy-duty vibration dampening, plush shock absorption, and high-cushion comfort tailored for slower recovery runs.

    Scores — ASICS GT 2000 13: 8.5/10, Nimbus 27: 7.5/10

    Lighter, firmer shoes facilitate quicker transitions and faster paces, while heavier shoes prioritize vibration dampening.

    Sources: Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 13 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)

  • Intended Use & Training Role

    While the ASICS GT-2000 13 serves as an all-around daily trainer with an 8 mm drop suited for varying paces, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is dedicated to easy and recovery miles with a maximalist 40.5 mm heel stack height.

    ASICS GT 2000 13: The ASICS GT-2000 13 is designed as a versatile, moderate-stability daily workhorse suited for daily mileage, moderate paces, and mixed workouts, weighing approximately 9.7 oz (275 g) with an 8 mm heel-to-toe drop.

    Nimbus 27: The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 is engineered primarily for plush comfort on easy days, recovery runs, and long slow distance training, featuring a high-cushion platform with a 40.5 mm heel stack height.

    Scores — ASICS GT 2000 13: 8.5/10, Nimbus 27: 8/10

    Selecting a shoe that aligns with a runner's training schedule—from daily miles and tempo workouts to long recovery runs—maximizes comfort and performance.

    Sources: Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 13 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)

  • Upper Fit & Step-In Comfort

    While the ASICS GT-2000 13 offers multiple width offerings and earned a 5/5 heel padding durability score, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 provides a plusher step-in feel with its stretchy knit tongue and jacquard mesh upper [1, 2].

    ASICS GT 2000 13: The ASICS GT-2000 13 features a breathable engineered mesh upper with a secure midfoot lockdown, a gusseted tongue, and multiple width options (Narrow, Standard, Wide, and Extra Wide) to accommodate various foot volumes [1, 3]. In laboratory testing, its upper demonstrated top-tier durability, earning a 5/5 heel padding durability score [1].

    Nimbus 27: The ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 emphasizes step-in plushness with a premium engineered jacquard mesh upper, a redesigned stretchy knit tongue, and a thickly padded heel collar that provides a sock-like fit [2, 12]. In lab testing, the Nimbus 27 upper scored 3/5 in toebox durability while delivering high breathability and secure heel lockdown [2].

    Scores — ASICS GT 2000 13: 8.1/10, Nimbus 27: 9.2/10

    Upper breathability, padding, and lockdown affect overall comfort during long sessions on the road.

    Sources: Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 13 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)

What are the pros and cons of ASICS GT 2000 13 vs Nimbus 27?

ASICS GT 2000 13

Strengths

  • The ASICS GT-2000 13 actively supports overpronators via its 3D Guidance System, structured medial platform geometry, and a 4 out of 5 torsional stiffness rating [1].
  • At approximately 9.5 oz (269 g), the ASICS GT-2000 13 is notably lighter than the ASICS Nimbus 27, offering snappier transitions and greater versatility for varied paces and daily training.
  • The ASICS GT-2000 13 earned a top-tier 5/5 score for heel padding durability in laboratory testing [1].
  • The ASICS GT-2000 13 provides broad accommodation across four width options (Narrow, Standard, Wide, and Extra Wide) alongside a secure gusseted tongue [1, 3].
  • The moderate 36.5mm heel stack with FF Blast Plus foam and rearfoot PureGEL provides a balanced ride with responsive ground feel.

Weaknesses

  • The ASICS GT-2000 13 has a lower 36.5mm heel stack height, providing less maximal shock absorption and plushness over long recovery runs compared to the ASICS Nimbus 27.
  • The ASICS GT-2000 13 delivers a less plush step-in upper feel compared to the premium stretchy knit tongue and heavily padded collar on the ASICS Nimbus 27 [12].

Nimbus 27

Strengths

  • The ASICS Nimbus 27 delivers maximalist underfoot impact protection with an ultra-plush heel stack measuring up to 43.5mm.
  • The ASICS Nimbus 27 provides premium step-in comfort through an engineered jacquard mesh upper, a stretchy knit tongue, and a thickly padded heel collar [2, 12].
  • An expansive 123.6 mm wide forefoot base provides dependable inherent platform stability for neutral runners [2].

Weaknesses

  • At approximately 10.7 oz (303 g), the ASICS Nimbus 27 is heavier, making it less suited for uptempo workouts.
  • The ASICS Nimbus 27 lacks dedicated medial posting or targeted pronation-control mechanisms, relying solely on broad base geometry for neutral support [2].
  • The maximalist stack height sacrifices ground feel, limiting its role primarily to easy miles and recovery runs.
  • The ASICS Nimbus 27 upper achieved a lower 3/5 toebox durability score in laboratory testing [2].

Where does this data come from?

  1. Cut in half: ASICS GT 2000 13 Review
  2. Cut in half: ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)
  3. ASICS GT-2000 13 Review (2024)
  4. Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 Performance Review
  5. Running Lab Asics GT-2000 13 Review
  6. SHOE REVIEW: Asics Gel-Nimbus 27
  7. Is Asics GT-2000 13 a different shoe than Asics GT-2000 10?
  8. Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 Review: Too Soft or Just Right?
  9. SHOE REVIEW: Asics GT-2000 13
  10. Preorder – ASICS GEL–NIMBUS 27
  11. (Pre) Launch Season - ASICS GT–2000 13
  12. ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review (2025)
  13. ASICS GT 2000 13 First Look | Reliable Stability Continues To ...
  14. Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 Review: Same, But The Same
  15. ASICS GT-2000 13 Review: Stability that is never in the ...
  16. ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 vs ASICS Gel Cumulus 27
  17. Asics GT-2000 13 vs 12 Full Review by a Foot Specialist
  18. ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 Review
  19. Running Lab Asics GT-2000 13 Review
  20. ASICS Gel Nimbus 27 Review

Create your own comparison

Related AI comparisons