ASICS Noosa Tri 16 vs ASICS Novablast 5

Who wins: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 or ASICS Novablast 5?

Choose the ASICS Novablast 5 first if you need a versatile, highly cushioned daily trainer for long miles and recovery runs, but select the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 first if your priority is a lightweight, responsive tempo shoe for speed sessions and triathlon racing.

Based on our analysis across 5 dimensions with 20 sources, ASICS Noosa Tri 16 scores 8.6/10 overall while ASICS Novablast 5 scores 8.2/10 overall.

Should I choose ASICS Noosa Tri 16 or ASICS Novablast 5?

Verdict: Choose the ASICS Novablast 5 first if you need a versatile, highly cushioned daily trainer for long miles and recovery runs, but select the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 first if your priority is a lightweight, responsive tempo shoe for speed sessions and triathlon racing.

Choose the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 for lightweight speedwork and triathlon racing, or select the ASICS Novablast 5 for plush, high-mileage daily cushioning and recovery.

The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 excels in fast-paced training and triathlon events thanks to its ultralight 7.6 oz (215 g) build, low 5mm to 5.9mm drop, maximum 5/5 breathability score, and superior ASICSGRIP outsole delivering a 0.79 wet friction score that is 68.1% higher than average. In contrast, the $140 ASICS Novablast 5 is designed as a daily workhorse, weighing 9.0 oz (255 g) with an 8mm drop and a much taller 40.9 mm to 41.5 mm FF BLAST MAX heel stack that provides heavy impact absorption (141 SA heel) and up to 66.5% forefoot energy return compared to the 60.5% return of the Noosa Tri 16.

Best for ASICS Noosa Tri 16

• Triathlon racing and fast transitions
• Tempo runs and interval speedwork
• Runners wanting an ultralight 7.6 oz (215 g) shoe
• Sockless running with maximum 5/5 breathability
• Wet-weather running requiring superior grip (0.79 friction score)
• Natural midfoot/forefoot strikers preferring a lower 5mm drop

Best for ASICS Novablast 5

• Daily training and high-mileage base building
• Recovery runs requiring plush impact absorption
• Runners seeking max cushioning with a 40.9 mm to 41.5 mm heel stack
• Heel strikers benefiting from a standard 8mm drop
• Runners wanting higher energy return (up to 66.5%)
• Those needing a roomier forefoot fit measuring 98.4 mm

When not to compare directly

Do not compare the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and ASICS Novablast 5 directly when deciding between a lightweight, sockless-friendly triathlon tempo shoe and a high-stack, plush recovery cruiser, as they are engineered for fundamentally distinct training roles.

What are the key differences between ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and ASICS Novablast 5?

• Midsole Technology and Cushioning Feel

  The ASICS Novablast 5 delivers a much plusher, higher-rebound max-cushion platform with a 40.9 mm heel stack, whereas the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 provides a firmer, lower-to-the-ground 32.8 mm heel stack designed for nimble, rockered transitions [1, 10].

  ASICS Noosa Tri 16: The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 features full-length FF Blast+ cushioning with a moderate 32.8 mm heel stack and 26.9 mm forefoot stack (5.9 mm drop), delivering a firmer, direct, and rockered ride with 60.5% forefoot energy return [1].

  ASICS Novablast 5: The ASICS Novablast 5 utilizes higher-stack FF BLAST MAX foam measuring 40.9 mm in the heel and 33.5 mm in the forefoot, delivering a significantly softer, plush ride with high shock absorption (141 SA heel / 134 SA forefoot) and up to 66.5% forefoot energy return [10].

  Scores — ASICS Noosa Tri 16: 7.8/10, ASICS Novablast 5: 9.2/10

  Determines the level of impact protection, stack height, and energetic rebound underfoot across various training distances.

  Sources: Cut in half: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 5 Review

• Weight and Heel-to-Toe Drop

  The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 is 1.4 oz lighter with a lower 5mm drop compared to the 9.0 oz build and standard 8mm drop of the ASICS Novablast 5.

  ASICS Noosa Tri 16: The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 features an ultralight build at approximately 7.6 oz (215 g) with a low 5mm heel-to-toe drop (34.5mm heel / 29.5mm forefoot), promoting rapid turnover and natural midfoot-to-forefoot strikes during speedwork and tempo runs [1, 5].

  ASICS Novablast 5: The ASICS Novablast 5 weighs noticeably more at around 9.0 oz (255 g) and employs a traditional 8mm heel-to-toe drop (41.5mm heel / 33.5mm forefoot), offering higher stack protection and heel-strike accommodation for long-distance training [4, 10].

  Scores — ASICS Noosa Tri 16: 8.8/10, ASICS Novablast 5: 7.9/10

  Affects running mechanics, foot strike adaptation, and leg turnover fatigue during speedwork or long efforts.

  Sources: Cut in half: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 5 Review

• Intended Use and Training Versatility

  While the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 is built for speed and quick triathlon transitions with a light 7.6 oz build, the ASICS Novablast 5 serves as a high-cushion daily workhorse featuring a taller 41.5 mm heel stack for sustained mileage.

  ASICS Noosa Tri 16: The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 is engineered as a lightweight tempo trainer and triathlon shoe, weighing just 7.6 oz (215 g) with a 34.5 mm heel stack, optimized for quick transitions, interval sessions, and uptempo efforts.

  ASICS Novablast 5: The ASICS Novablast 5 is designed as a high-mileage daily cruiser and recovery trainer, featuring a plush FF BLAST MAX midsole with a generous 41.5 mm heel stack to absorb impact over easy miles and long training blocks.

  Scores — ASICS Noosa Tri 16: 8.5/10, ASICS Novablast 5: 9/10

  Helps runners select the right tool depending on whether they need a speed/tempo workout shoe or an everyday high-mileage cruiser.

  Sources: Cut in half: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 5 Review

• Upper Construction, Breathability, and Fit

  While the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 achieves a maximum 5/5 breathability score with transition pull tabs and a seamless liner for sockless use, the ASICS Novablast 5 provides a plush engineered jacquard upper with a roomy 98.4 mm forefoot suited for standard daily training.

  ASICS Noosa Tri 16: The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 features an open-mesh upper built specifically for triathlon racing and sockless comfort, achieving a maximum 5/5 breathability lab score with dedicated heel and tongue pull tabs for quick transitions [1].

  ASICS Novablast 5: The ASICS Novablast 5 uses an engineered jacquard mesh upper focused on step-in comfort and everyday lockdown, pairing a gusseted tongue and a spacious forefoot measuring 98.4 mm with a more moderately ventilated construction [10].

  Scores — ASICS Noosa Tri 16: 9.2/10, ASICS Novablast 5: 8.1/10

  Influences comfort, foot lockdown, and suitability for sockless wear or quick entry.

  Sources: Cut in half: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 5 Review

• Outsole Traction and Durability

  The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 provides significantly superior wet road traction with its ASICSGRIP rubber scoring 0.79 in friction testing, whereas the ASICS Novablast 5 uses mid-tier AHAR LO rubber where wet grip remains its main performance limitation [1, 10].

  ASICS Noosa Tri 16: The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 features premium ASICSGRIP outsole rubber, achieving a stellar wet-condition traction friction score of 0.79 in lab testing [1]. While its grip is 68.1% higher than the running shoe average, the design leaves a substantial amount of exposed midsole foam that can reduce long-term durability for heavy heel strikers [1].

  ASICS Novablast 5: The ASICS Novablast 5 utilizes an AHAR LO rubber compound outsole paired with deeper pod geometry, priced at $140 [10, 20]. While it provides decent rubber coverage and reliable dry-road durability across high mileage, traction on wet surfaces remains noted as its weakest performance aspect [10].

  Scores — ASICS Noosa Tri 16: 8.5/10, ASICS Novablast 5: 6.8/10

  Ensures grip on wet roads and overall lifespan of the shoe across high-volume mileage.

  Sources: Cut in half: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review, Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 5 Review

What are the pros and cons of ASICS Noosa Tri 16 vs ASICS Novablast 5?

Where does this data come from?

1. Cut in half: ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review
2. NOVABLAST Running Shoes | ASICS US
3. NOOSA TRI 16 Triathlon Shoe | ASICS US
4. Asics Novablast 5 Performance Review
5. Asics Noosa Tri 16 Performance Review
6. Asics Novablast 5 Review
7. ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review (2024)
8. ASICS Novablast 5 Review
9. ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Day of the Dead Shoes are Lively and ...
10. Cut in half: ASICS Novablast 5 Review
11. Asics Noosa Tri 16 Review: Just Another Shoe?
12. ASICS Novablast 5 Review: Does It Live Up to the Hype?
13. Noosa Tri 16 reviret : r/RunningShoeGeeks
14. ASICS Novablast 5 Review (2024): Better and Better
15. ASICS NOOSA TRI 16 | Running Shoe DB
16. Asics Novablast 5 review - Run & Smile
17. ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Review - In-Depth Analysis | RunRotation
18. ASICS Novablast 5 Review: Blast Off?
19. ASICS Noosa Tri 16 Shoe Review - FueledByLOLZ
20. Running Lab Asics Novablast 5 Review

Create your own comparison